IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Bhag Singh Arya .....Appellant Versus Haryana Agricultural University, Hissar & others .....Respondents

1. Reserved on : 12.02.2026 2. Pronounced on : 19.02.2026 3. Uploaded on the website : 19.02.2026

4. Whether only operative part of the judgment is : Full pronounced or full judgment is pronounced

5. The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full : Not applicable judgment, and reasons thereof CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Argued by : Mr. Sukesh Kumar Jindal, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Shreenath A Khemka, Advocate and Ms. Tvesha Gupta, Advocate for the respondents.

****

NAMIT KUMAR , J .

1. The appellant/plaintiff is in Regular Second Appeal before this Court challenging the judgment and decree dated 28.11.1994, passed by learned First Appellate Court, whereby the appeal preferred by the respondents/defendants, has been partly accepted and the judgment and decree dated 21.02.1994, passed by learned Trial Court has been modified to the extent that the plaintiff shall not be entitled to arrears of salary from the date of acceptance of his resignation to the date of his joining, pursuant to the learned Trial Court decree.

2.