IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJ KUMAR AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
261-3 cases
1. CWP-17713-2021 (O&M)
Raj Kumar and another …. Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others …. Respondent 2. CWP-15706-2021 (O&M) Hasim Khan and others …. Petitioners Versus Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and others …. Respondents and
3. CWP-20218-2021 (O&M) Ranbir and another …. Petitioners Versus Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and others …. Respondents DATE OF DECISION : 17th February, 2026 CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR * * *
Present : Mr.Vijay Kumar Jindal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Sandeep Lather, Advocate and Mr.Abhishek Shukla, Advocate for the petitioners in CWP-17713-2021.
Mr.Nafees Ahmad Khan, Advocate for the petitioners in CWP-15706-2021 and CWP-20218-2021.
Mr.Nitin Kaushal, Addl.AG, Haryana.
Mr.Hitesh Pandit, Advocate for respondent – DHBVN.
* * *
ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (Oral)
1. This judgment shall dispose of three writ petitions i.e. CWP- 15706-2021, CWP-17713-2021 and CWP-20218-2021, as they raise common questions of law. However, for reference, the facts are being taken from CWP-17713-2021.
2. This writ petition seeks to assail the notificatio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.