IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (130)

Date of Decision:-17.02.2026 PARAMJEET KUMAR AND ANOTHER … Petitioners Versus HARPREET SINGH AND ANOTHER ... Respondents -.-

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Umesh Kumar Kanwar, Advocate with Ms. Nisha Rana, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Vijay Lath, Advocate, with Mr. Ajay S. Dhiman, Advocate, for the respondents.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. The present civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 20.01.2026, vide which, the learend Civil Judge in Civil Miscellaneous Application has declined the application filed by the petitioners seeking stay of operation of the ex parte judgment and decree dated 25.09.2024 in application filed for setting aside ex parte judgment and decree under Order IX Rule 13 of Code of Civil Procedure (CPC).

2. Respondents has put in appearance through Mr. Vijay Lath, Advocate, by filing Caveat.

3. I have heard both the counsels and gone through the impugned order carefully.

4. Perusal of the impugned order shows that the learned Civil Judge has declined stay of the execution proceedings by recording r