SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 4386

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CHANNO ALIAS CHARNA KAUR – Appellant
Versus
DARSHANA RANI AND ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Channo alias Charan Kaur ….Petitioner versus Darshana Rani and another ….Respondents Date of decision: February 17, 2026 Date of Uploading: February 17, 2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present:- Mr. Krishan Sehajpal, Advocate for the petitioner.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)

CRM-2994-2018 Application herein has been filed on behalf of the applicant-

petitioner seeking condonation of delay of 112 days in filing the accompanying revision petition. The main revision petition has been filed impugning the judgment dated 08.06.2017 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jalandhar, whereby, the respondents have been discharged.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant-petitioner, while seeking grant of prayer for condonation of delay of 112 days, has argued that the complaint was dismissed on 08.06.2017 and certified copy was applied on 05.07.2017, which was prepared on 20.07.2017 and received on

29.07.2017. Learned counsel has further argued that the petitioner was under impression that limitation period of 90 days starts from the date of receiving certified copy of the order. Learned counsel has further argued t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top