SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 4445

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DEEN MOHAMMAD AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
KALLU & ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : 29.01.2026 Deen Mohammad and another ...... Appellants versus Kallu and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the appellants.

None for respondent No.1(i).

Mr. Tanmoy Gupta, Advocate for LR of respondent No.2(i)&(ii).

****

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral)

1. Plaintiff is in appeal, aggrieved of judgement and decree passed by the Lower Appellate Court whereby judgement and decree passed by the Court of First Instance has been reversed and the suit filed by the plaintiff has been ordered to be dismissed.

2. Plaintiff filed suit, seeking decree of specific performance of agreement to sell dated 29.06.1987. As per plaintiff, defendant who was owner in possession of suit land (ad-measuring 12 Kanals as detailed in the plaint) executed written agreement to sell in his favour ₹

agreeing to sell the suit land for total sale consideration of 40,000.

Earnest money of 20,000 was paid. Parties agreed to get the sale deed executed on or before 15.06.1988. The land was lying mortgaged with Land Development Bank Firozepur, Jhirka. Defendant agreed to get the land redeemed on or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top