SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 4491

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ROOPA MEHRA @ RUKMANI – Appellant
Versus
SHYAM BHARDWAJ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 22.01.2026 Roopa Mehra @ Rukmani ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Shyam Bhardwaj ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Rajesh Arora, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Sandeep Jasuja, Advocate for the respondent.

******

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Defendant is in Second Appeal against the judgment of reversal; whereby suit filed by the plaintiff/respondent for specific performance, has been decreed by the First Appellate Court for specific performance.

2. The pleaded case of the plaintiff/respondent is that the defendant, being owner in possession of the suit house had entered into an Agreement to Sell dated 21.11.2005 with the plaintiff for a total sale consideration of Rs.2 lacs. At the time of execution of agreement, the plaintiff alleged to have paid ₹10,000/– to the defendant in cash as earnest amount. A further payment of ₹40,000 in cash and ₹1,00,000 is alleged to have been made to the defendant at time of execution of subsequent Agreement to Sell on 16.12.2005. In this manner, the plaintiff had paid earnest money of Rs.1,50,000/- in separate instalments. Target date for execution of Sale Deed was set for 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top