IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 21.01.2026 HARISH SINGH BHALLA ....Petitioner Versus DAYAL SINGH AND ANOTHER ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Mr. Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioner.

YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR. J.(Oral)

1. The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 06.01.2026 (Annexure P-8), passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Khadoor Sahib, in Civil Suit No.59 dated 22.04.2021, whereby, learned trial Court, closed the evidence of the plaintiff allegedly without analyzing the order dated

28.11.2025.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the application for summoning witnesses which was moved by the plaintiff/petitioner was declined by the trial Court vide order dated 18.11.2025 and against the said order, petitioner had preferred Civil Rivision No.8679 of 2025, which was allowed vide order dated 28.11.2025 and the petitioner was granted two effective opportunities to lead evidence, subject to payment of R