SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 4536

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JASKARAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER – Respondent



(cid:1) (cid:1)

(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:1)(cid:5)(cid:2)(cid:7)(cid:5)(cid:1)(cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:4)(cid:1)(cid:9)(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:13)(cid:10)(cid:3)(cid:14)(cid:15)(cid:16)(cid:1)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:1)(cid:5)(cid:15)(cid:11)(cid:18)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:15)(cid:1)

(cid:15)(cid:4)(cid:1)(cid:8)(cid:5)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:2)(cid:7)(cid:15)(cid:11)(cid:5)(cid:1)(cid:1)

(cid:2)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)

CRR-3384-2025 (O&M)

(cid:17)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:21)(cid:1)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:1)(cid:24)(cid:21)ti(cid:26)(cid:27)(cid:26)(cid:22)(cid:28)(cid:29)(cid:1)(cid:30)(cid:31) !(cid:31) (cid:30)!(cid:30)"

(cid:1)

JASKARAN SINGH (cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:6)(cid:11)(cid:1)

(cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:15)(cid:16)(cid:15)

(cid:15)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:17)(cid:13)(cid:1)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:1)(cid:5)(cid:16)(cid:21)(cid:22)(cid:18)(cid:23)(cid:1)(cid:18)(cid:21)(cid:24)(cid:1)(cid:18)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:17)ti(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1) (cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:14)(cid:6)(cid:26)(cid:27)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:28)(cid:6)(cid:10)(cid:7)(cid:26)(cid:1)(cid:1)

(cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:11)(cid:15)#(cid:1)(cid:29)(cid:1)(cid:5)(cid:9)(cid:3)$(cid:16)%(cid:6)(cid:1)#(cid:11) (cid:1)(cid:14)(cid:10)&(cid:4)(cid:2)(cid:8)(cid:6)(cid:1)’(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:9)(cid:17)(cid:1)& (cid:1)(cid:16)(cid:5)(cid:15)(cid:11)(cid:17)((cid:15)(cid:14)(cid:1)

(cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) )))))(cid:1)

(cid:5)(cid:11)(cid:6)(cid:26)(cid:6)(cid:10)(cid:7)(cid:29)(cid:1)(cid:30)(cid:1)(cid:1) (cid:31)(cid:11)(cid:4)(cid:1) !(cid:27)(cid:8)"(cid:1) #!(cid:10)(cid:10)!$(cid:1)(cid:18)(cid:28)%(cid:9)&!(cid:7)(cid:6)(cid:1)

(cid:1) (cid:1) ’(cid:9)(cid:11)(cid:1)(cid:7)#(cid:6)(cid:1)(cid:27)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:6)(cid:11)(cid:4)(cid:1) (cid:1)

(cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) ((((((cid:1)

’(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:9)(cid:17)(cid:1)& (cid:1)(cid:16)(cid:5)(cid:15)(cid:11)(cid:17)((cid:15)(cid:14)*(cid:1)(cid:14) (cid:1)+(cid:9),(cid:19)-.

1. The instant revision petition has been filed against the judgment dated 07.03.2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sri Muktsar Sahib wherein the the petitioner has been convicted for a period of two years with a fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 07 days as well as the judgment dated 13.11.2025 passed by the Sessions Judge, Sri Muktsar Sahib whereby his appeal had been partly allowed and while maintaining the judgment of conviction, the sentence had been reduced to one year.

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present proceedings are that Complaint bearing CIS No. NIA/73/2021 was instituted by the respondent–complainant, a non-banking finance company, against the petitioner herein. The respondent–complainant averred that it is engaged in the business of financing, leasing and hire purchase of machines and equipment. It was averred that the petitioner approached the respondent– complainant for financial assistance for purchase of a vehicle, namely TATA LPT 2515 bearing registration No. RJ-04GA-0601, for his personal requirements. Pursuant thereto, a loan agreement was executed between the parties on 13.07.2018, whereunder a sum of Rs. 3,80,000/- was advanced to the petitioner. The loan amount was agreed to be repaid in 36 equated monthly instalments. According to the respondent–complainant, the petitioner committed default in adhering to the terms and conditions of repayment and failed to liquidate the outstanding dues despite repeated demands. Eventually, towards discharge of his liability, the petitioner issued cheque No. 66

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top