IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

256 Reserved on: 21.01.2026 Pronounced on: 28.01.2026 Uploaded on: 28.01.2026 Ajit Singh ...Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. K.S. Lakhanpal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Rituraj Singh, DAG, Punjab.

*****

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)

The instant criminal revision petition has been preferred against the judgment and order of sentence dated 18.8.2023 passed by the Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Dasuya, whereby the revisionist-petitioner has been convicted and sentenced as under:-

2. Further challenge is also made to the judgment dated

26.08.2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hoshiarpur vide which appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed. However, the sentence was modified by the Ld. Additional Sessions Judge after observing that judgment of Trial Court shows that the appellant was convicted under Section 283 and

304-A IPC but at the time of sentencing, no sentence mentioned with regard to Section 283. Rather the sentence was given under Section 279 IPC. Thus sentence was modified to Rs. 200 fine under Section 283 IPC and in default thereof s