IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SAHIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on : 27.02.2026 Pronounced on : 06.03.2026 Sahil ..... Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana ..... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Argued by : Mr. Sanchit Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana.
Mr. Sanchit Punia, Advocate for the complainant.
*****
SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J.
This petition for bail is the first petition, filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.454 dated 23.09.2024, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5), 61(2)
of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station City Hisar, District Hisar.
2. The abovementioned FIR came into being at the instance of ‘Prerna’, hereinafter being referred to as ‘complainant’ only. It was stated by the above-named complainant that the marriage of her brother Amardeep was solemnized with Krishma, and that after marriage, the mother and step- father of Krishma used to harass complainant’s father Vijay Ahuja. According to complainant, Krishma had even sold the gold jewellery gifted to her
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.