IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2109-2026 (O&M)

Date of decision: 06.03.2026 Gurwinder Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus Gurdit Kaur @ Kashmir Kaur and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Naresh Kumar Khepar, Advocate for the petitioners.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. This is a revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 06.11.2025 (Annexure P-10) passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Pehowa, District Kurukshetra.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that two objections have been raised by the petitioners in their application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. One being with respect to Court fees and other being with respect to limitation.

3. It would be relevant to note that a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case titled as “Arun Kumar Goyal Vs. Payal Aggarwal, reported as 2013(4) R.C.R. (Civil) 93, had observed that no revision would lie at the instance of the defendant against the decision on the question of inadequacy of court fee as the question of non-payment of Court fee is a dispute between the litigant and the Registry. Reliance