IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 05.03.2026 Ronki Ram …Petitioner V/s Gram Panchayat, Village Bapda and others …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Hardeep Singh Dhillon, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Raghav Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

***

VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL)

The present revision petition, preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assails the order dated 08.10.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Kurukshetra, vide which the application moved by respondent-defendant No.3 under Order 26 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short “the CPC”) for the appointment of a local commissioner was allowed.

2. A suit (Annexure P-17) was instituted by the petitioner-plaintiff (Ronki Ram) for permanent injunction restraining the respondents-defendants from dispossessing the petitioner-plaintiff from Plot No.65 allotted to him vide allotment letter dated 08.01.2010 and for restraining them from creating any kind of interference in the peaceful possession of the same.

3. An application under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC (Annexure P-2) was moved by respondent-defend