IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

RSA-944-1995 (O&M) Tek Chand and others . . . . Appellants Vs.

Gurdial Chand and others . . . . Respondents ****

Reserved on: 25.02.2026 Pronounced on: 05.03.2026 Pronounced Fully/Operative Part: Fully ****

CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA ****

Present: - Mr. Rajesh Bhateja, Advocate, for appellants No.1, 2 & 4.

Mr. R.K. Arya, Advocate, for the respondents.

****

DEEPAK GUPTA, J.

The present Regular Second Appeal has been preferred by four out of six original defendants challenging the concurrent findings recorded by the Courts below, whereby the suit for permanent injunction filed by plaintiff– Gurdial Chand was decreed by the learned trial Court on 03.11.1993, and the said decree was affirmed by the learned first Appellate Court vide judgment dated 13.02.1995.

2. The record reveals that the suit property measuring 34 kanal 5 marla situated in the revenue estate of Village Pakhowal Kothian, Tehsil and District Gurdaspur is admi5edly owned by the Central Government. The plain6ff, however, claimed to be in cul6va6ng possession of the said land as a tenant for a considerable period and, alleging interference by the defendants, ins