SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 4683

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANGEETA – Appellant
Versus
MTHALAI MUTHU & OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 05.03.2026 Sangeeta ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Mthalai Muthu and others ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Ms. Mansi Majoka, Advocate and Mr. Bhisham Kumar Majora, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. D.K.Prajapati, Advocate for respondent No.04.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

CM-21269-CII-2018 Prayer in this application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is for condonation of delay of 127 days in filing the appeal.

2. The only reason cited by learned counsel for the applicant/appellant in the abovesaid application for condonation of 127 days delay in filing the appeal is as under:-

“2. That the appellant could not able to contact with the counsel in time due to his illness and accordingly alongwith requisite document contact with a counsel for filing the appeal, thereafter the instant appeal has been prepared and filed and in doing so inadvertently the period of limitation has been exceed.”

3. The said reason is vague and does not constitute sufficient cause to condone extraordinary delay of 127 days in filing the present appeal.

4. As such, no ground is made out for condoning inordinate delay of 127 day

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top