IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SHIMBHU SINGH ALIAS SHIMBHU SINGH CHAUHAN AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
TEJBIR – Respondent
##PAGE1##
RSA-3387-2025 (O&M) - 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
221 RSA-3387-2025 (O&M)
Date of decision: 27.02.2026
Shimbhu Singh @ Shimbhu Singh Chauhan and others ...Appellant(s)
Vs.
Tejbir ...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present:- Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate
for the appellants.
******
NIDHI GUPTA, J.
Present Second Appeal has been filed by the defendants
against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned District
Courts; whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff/respondent for specific
performance of Agreement to Sell dated 04.02.2013, has been decreed by
both the District Courts for specific performance.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the defendants are owners in
possession of the suit property measuring 8K 19M. Vide the Agreement to
Sell dated 04.02.2013, the Appellants had agreed to sell the suit property
to the plaintiff @ Rs.19 lacs per acre i.e. for total sale consideration of
about Rs.22 lacs. It was pleaded in the plaint that the plaintiff had paid
earnest money of ₹20 lakhs in cash which had been received by Shri Vijay
Singh, on behalf of the appellants by way of earnest money. Target date
for execution of Sale Deed was set for 04.05.2013 or within 10 days from
the date of getÝng NOC from DTP by defendants. In case, the defendants
DIVYANSHI
2026.03.05 10:49
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE2##RSA-3387-2025 (O&M) - 2 -
failed to get Sale Deed registered within the stipulated period, plaintiff
was given right to get Sale Deed executed and registered by filing specific
performance suit. It was averred in the suit that the plaintiff was always
ready and willing to perform his part of the contract and had duly
appeared before the Sub Registrar on 03.05.2013 and 06.05.2013
alongwith balance sale consideration and got his AfÏdavits of Attendance
attested. However, the defendants had not turned up. Plaintiff had issued
registered Legal notice dated 10.07.2014 to the defendants and their
mother for execution and registration of Sale Deed. Plaintiff had gone to
the ofÏce of Sub Registrar even on 23.07.2014 but the defendants did not
turn up. With these pleadings, present suit was filed on 03.05.2016.
3. Upon appraisal of the pleadings and the evidence led by the
parties, vide judgment and decree dated 14.05.2019 the learned
Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bawal had decreed the suit of the
plaintiff “to the effect that the defendants are directed to get the sale
deed executed to the extent of 7/24 share i.e. 8 Kanal 19 Marlas (suit
property) in favour of the plaintiff within the period of two months on the
payment of the balance sale consideration by the plaintiff.” The Civil
Appeal filed by the defendants was dismissed by the Additional District
Judge, Rewari vide judgment and decree dated 14.08.2025. Hence,
present second appeal by the defendants.
4. It is inter alia submitted by learned counsel for the appellants
that the learned District Courts were in error in decreeing the suit of the
plaintiff as they failed to appreciate that the Agreement to Sell dated
DIVYANSHI
2026.03.05 10:49
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE3##RSA-3387-2025 (O&M) - 3 -
04.02.2013 propounded by the plaintiff is in itself surrounded by
suspicious circumstances. It is submitted that in actual fact, the
Agreement to Sell dated 04.02.2013 was in respect of land measuring 14K
5 Sarsai yet plaintiff has filed the present suit only in respect of 18K 9M.
Moreover, defendants had categorically pleaded in the written statement
that not even single amount was paid by the plaintiff at the time of
alleged Agreement to Sell. This fact has not been appreciated by the
learned District Courts. It is submitted that in fact the signature of Sanwat
Singh, one of the vendors of Agreement to Sell, was forged and fabricated.
In actual fact, the plaintiff has fabricated the Agreement to Sell without
paying single penny to the defendants. Plaintiff has failed to prove
execution of the alleged Agreement coupled wi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.