(113) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:25.02.2026 MAHENDER ...Petitioner Vs.

VED PARKASH ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. S.S.Momi, Advocate for the petitioner.

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J. (Oral)

1. The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set aside the impugned order dated 26.05.2025 (Annexure P-1), passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kaithal, whereby the application filed by the petitioner/defendant for permission to further cross-examine PW-4, Angrej, has been dismissed.

2. Briefly stated, the respondent/plaintiff instituted a suit for recovery on the basis of a pronote alleged to have been executed on 28.04.2015. The petitioner/defendant contested the suit, specifically denying the execution of any pronote and alleging that the same is a fabricated document prepared in connivance with the family members of the plaintiff. After framing of issues, the plaintiff examined himself as PW-1 and thereafter examined PW-4, Angrej Kumar, the alleged scribe of the pronote. PW-4 was duly cross-examined by learned counsel for the