SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 4788

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JAGDISH CHAND GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 24.02.2026 Jagdish Chand Gupta …..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present : None for the petitioner.

Mr. Satnampreet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab.

****

NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 02.08.2012 (Annexure P-9), passed by respondent No.1 whereby second ACP has been granted after completion of 11 years of service as Senior Assistant instead of completion of 09 years of service i.e. from 24.12.2007 instead of 24.12.2005; for quashing the orders dated 28.12.2012 (Annexure P- 10) and 20.11.2014 (Annexure P-11) whereby application as well as appeal filed by the petitioner for expunging the adverse remarks in the ACR for the period of 2004-05 have been rejected; for quashing the order dated 01.12.2025 (Annexure P-18) whereby representation of the petitioner has been rejected and a writ of mandamus has been sought directing the respondents to grant second ACP to the petitioner on co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top