130 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : 24.02.2026 CHARAN SINGH ....Petitioner Versus MAHABIR SINGH ETC. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present : Mr. Ritesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Naveen S. Panwar, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Rakesh Dhiman, Advocate for respondents No.10, 23 and 24.

Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the respondent(s).

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)

Present revision petition is directed against orders passed by the Courts below dismissing the application filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC by the petitioner/plaintiff.

2. The plaintiff filed suit seeking partition with the consequential relief of permanent injunction and mandatory injunction. Along with the suit, an application was filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC seeking interim injunction against defendants No.1 to 25 in form of restrain order to injunct them from raising construction during the pendency of the suit.

3. Defendants No.1 to 9, 11 to 18, 22, 26 and 27 contested the suit. In reply to the application filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC, it was claimed that the estate already stands partitioned in the year 1999. All co-sharers including