219 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.955 of 2014 Date of Decision : 12.02.2026 Rahisan ....Appellant Versus Mohd. Nisar Khan and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.

None for respondent No.1.

Ms. Palak Koundal, Advocate for Mr. Rajbir Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2-Insurance Company.

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)

The claimant is in appeal aggrieved of award dated 16.09.2013 passed by MACT, Nuh whereby claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the appellant/claimant stands dismissed.

2. As per the claim petition, claimant was travelling as a pillion rider on the motor-cycle driven by her son when it was hit by the offending vehicle. Claimant claims that she suffered grievous injuries on her legs. She remained hospitalized for more than 12 days.

3. Respondents denied accident. As per respondents, FIR was lodged against respondent No.1 in collusion with the petitioner.

4. Tribunal after analysing evidence on record found that after the claimant was hospitalized, police visited the hospital. Son of the claimant was present in the hospital. However, he refu