SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 4894

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SHAMSHER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
JAGROOP SINGH ANDORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

238 Date of decision : 20.01.2026 Shamsher Singh ...... Appellant versus Jagroop Singh and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Ms. Sushma Chopra, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.

****

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral)

1. Defendant No.3 is in second appeal.

2. Plaintiff filed suit seeking decree of permanent injunction with further relief of mandatory injunction.

3. Father of the plaintiff and father of defendant No.3 were real brothers and were co-sharers in a joint land measuring 125 bighas in equal share. For irrigating the land, electric connection was installed in the name of Arjan Singh-father of defendant No.3-Shamsher Singh, i.e. the appellant. Admittedly, the land was partitioned amongst the parties. The electricity connection fell in the land which came to the share of plaintiff.

4. As per the plaintiff, defendant No.3 by way of affidavit dated 16.10.2001, sold the motor connection after receiving full and final consideration. Plaintiff claims that an application was moved seeking transfer of the motor connection with the Electricity Board, i.e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top