IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: January 16, 2026 Mejar Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus Mohan Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present: Mr.Praveen Kumar Garg, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.Dheeraj Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.1.

****

ARCHANA PURI, J.

Challenge in the present revision petition is to the orders dated

29.05.2023 (Annexure P-8) and 21.11.2023 (Annexure P-10) passed by learned Executing Court, whereby, the warrant of attachment of the property was issued and thereupon, application under Order 21 Rule 66 CPC was filed by the decree holder and objections, at the instance of the petitioners-

JDs, were filed and the same were dismissed.

The facts, as culled out from the paperbook, are as follows:-

That, initially, respondent No.1-Mohan Singh had filed a suit bearing No.175 of 01.10.2009 against the petitioners and respondents No.2 to 5 (who were defendants No.1 to 5), for specific performance of agreement to sell dated 12.04.2006, for execution of the sale deed, and the land measuring 15 Kanal, as detailed in the decree-sheet, copy whereof is Annexure P-1. After completion of the pleadi