IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CHARLIE – Appellant
Versus
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ANOTHER – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** ****
Charlie ... Petitioner VS.
Punjab National Bank & Ors. ... Respondents
1. Judgment reserved on 16.01.2026 2. Judgment pronounced on 06.03.2026 3. Judgment uploaded on 07.03.2026
4. Whether operative or full judgment Full 5. Delay in pronouncement of full judgment NA and reasons, if any CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL ****
Present: Mr. Shabad Ahmad, Advocate and Mr. Pankaj Garg, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Preeti Grover, Advocate for Mr. Saurav Verma, Advocate for the respondents ****
Sandeep Moudgil, J.
(1). The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner and appoint him on compassionate ground on account of death of his father Ashok Kumar on 07.08.2018, in terms of Human Resources Management Division Circular No.495/2020 dated 26.03.2020 (Annexure P4) issued by the Bank itself.
(2). The father of the petitioner, namely, Shri Ashok Kumar was appointed as Peon in the respondent-Bank on 22.05.1985. He was later on promoted as Head Cashier, however, on his request on ac
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.