SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 5137

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BHAGWANA ETC. – Appellant
Versus
MANGE RAM ETC. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 25.02.2026 Pronounced on: 06.03.2026 Uploaded on: 09.03.2026 Bhagwana and others ….Appellants Versus Mange Ram and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Argued by: Mr. Kulvir Narwal, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Tapan Yadav, Advocate with Mr. Gursimrat Sandhu, Advocate for the respondents.

*****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J

1. The appellants–defendants, aggrieved by the concurrent judgment and decree dated 17.04.1996 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Rohtak, whereby the appeal preferred by them was dismissed and the judgment and decree dated 29.03.1994 passed by the learned Additional Senior Sub Judge, Bahadurgarh decreeing the suit of the respondents–plaintiffs was affirmed, have approached this Court by way of the present Regular Second Appeal.

BACKGROUND FACTS

2. The respondents–plaintiffs filed a suit for permanent injunction seeking to restrain the appellants–defendants from forcibly taking possession of the suit property. The case of the plaintiffs is that both parties are permanent residents of Village Shahpur, Tehsil Bahadurgarh, District Rohtak. The plaintiffs claimed to be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top