IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUBBEDIN @ SUKKI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
##PAGE1##
CRR-2946-2025 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRR-2946-2025 (O&M)
Subbedin @ Sukki ......Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ......Respondent
JUDGEMENT JUDGEMENT OPERATIVE PART UPLOADED ON
RESERVED PRONOUNCED PRONOUNCED OR
ON ON FULL
19.01.2026 05.03.2026 FULL PRONOUNCED 05.03.2026
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Ms. Rosi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Shiva Khurmi, D.A.G., Haryana
***
ANOOP CHITKARA J.
FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections
168 01.11.2007 Ferozepur Jhirka 3/8, 5/8 of C.S Act
Criminal Case before No. 06 of 2008
trial Court Decided on: 18.03.2009
Criminal Appeal before No. 24 of 2009
Appellate Court Decided on: 26.11.2010
Convict’s name Penal provision Sentence
Subbedin 3/8 of Cow Slaughter Act R.I. for three years with fine of Rs. 5,000/-
5/8 of Cow Slaughter Act R.I. for three years with fine of Rs. 5,000/-
CRM-46803-2025
1. Seeking condonation of delay of 4667 days in filing in the criminal revision
petition to enable the petitioner, who was convicted by the trial Court under Section 3 read with
Section 8 and 5 read with Section 8 of Cow Slaughter Act, has come up before this Court by
filing an application under Section 5 of Limitation Act along with revision petition.
2. State counsel submits that the applicant’s custody in the present case is 08
months and 21 days.
3. Counsel for the applicant submits that she would be contended and satisfied if
(cid:1)
1 of 3
::: Downloaded on - 09-03-2026 20:25:15 :::
##PAGE2##CRR-2946-2025 (O&M)
the sentence is reduced to the period of sentence already undergone.
4. A perusal of the judgment passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class,
Ferozepur Jhirka points out that the applicant was convicted under Section 3 read with Section
8 and Section 5 read with Section 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and he was sentenced to rigorous
imprisonment for a period of 03 years.
5. Before commenting on the merits of the case, it is necessary to see the
application for condonation of delay for 4667 days.
6. The State has not filed any reply despite order dated 21.11.2025, as such, this
Court has to analyze the contents of the application filed under the Limitation Act to assess the
justification to condone the delay.
7. The application for condonation of delay is registered as CRM No.46803 of
2025. There is a delay of 4667 days in filing the present revision petition. In paragraph 3, the
applicant submits that after the conviction by the concerned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, the
applicant has challenged the same by filing a criminal appeal bearing CRA No.62 of 2009
before the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nuh. However, his criminal appeal was
dismissed vide judgment dated 26.11.2010. Counsel for the applicant further submits that in
addition to the present petitioner, the conviction of co-convict, Rujdar, was also upheld and he
had challenged the same by filing a criminal revision petition before this Court which was
registered as CRR-240-2011 and the same was disposed of vide judgment dated 16.05.2011, on
the ground that he had undergone sufficient period of custody. He further submits that the
petition filed by co-convict Rujdar was disposed of by this Court, as such, the applicant was
under the impression that he would also get the same benefit of the sentence being reduced to
undergone. However, he was mis-informed and could not understand the implication that he
had to file a separate revision petition against his sentence.
8. Considering the technicalities of the law and lack of legal awareness amongst the
people, there is no reason to disbelieve the petitioner's mental awareness about the impact of
reduction of sentence of the co-convict. Thus, in the overall analysis of the facts and
circumstances, this Court is satisfied that despite the delay being massive, there are sufficient
reasons to condone the same.
9. Given above, the present application is allowed. Delay of 4667 days in filing the
present revision petition is condoned.
(cid:2)
2 of 3
::: Downloaded on - 09-03-202
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.