IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 26.02.2026 RSA No.1547 of 2015 (O&M)

Raj Kumar Mittal ....Appellant Versus Ashoo Arora and another .....Respondents RSA No.1563 of 2015 Ashoo Arora ....Appellant Versus Raj Kumar Mitta and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Pankaj Midha, Advocate for the appellant in RSA-1547-2015 and for respondent No.1 in RSA-1563-2015.

Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate for the appellant in RSA-1563-2015 and for respondent No.1 in RSA-1547-2015.

Respondent No.2 proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 01.03.2018 in RSA-1563-2015.

Service of respondent No.2 dispensed with vide order dated 01.03.2018 in RSA-1547-2015.

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)

These are cross-appeals arising out of a suit for specific performance.

2. Plaintiff filed suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell, dated 02.12.2004 claimed to have been executed by defendant No.1 in his favour whereby he agreed to sell plot bearing No.216 situated at Sector-27, Panchkula in favour of plaintiff for a total sale consideration of Rs.4,45,000/- over and above the amount already paid by defendant No.1 to defendant No.