IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.168 Date of Decision: 25.02.2026 KRISHNA DEVI AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners Versus HITESH AGGARWAL AND ANOTHER .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Govind Goel and Mr. Rahul Rana, Advocate for respondent No.2.

*****

ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)

Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated

05.09.2023, passed by learned trial Court in civil suit i.e. CS/394/2015, whereby the evidence of the petitioners (defendants in the original suit), was closed by order.

In pursuance of notice issued, respondent No.2 (one of the plaintiff in the orignal suit), made appearance through counsel. However, service upon respondent No.1 was not effected, on account of incomplete address.

Counsel for the parties heard.

The facts germane to be noticed are that the suit for possession, by way of specific performance of contract dated 12.01.2012, was filed by the respondents/plaintiffs, against the petitioners/defendants. During the pendency of the said suit, when it was at the stage of recording of defendant’s evidence, the evidence of the petitioners/defendant