IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.121 CRWP-2980-2026 Decided on : 17.03.2026 Amarjit Singh ...... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL ***

Present : Mr. Rajeev K.Kapila, Advocate for the petitioner.

***

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL , J (ORAL)

1. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner from respondents No.6. It is stated in the petition that the petitioner has already made representation dated 01.03.2026 (Annexure P-13) before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Hoshiarpur raising the said grievances, but no action has been taken so far.

2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.3-The Senior Superintendent of Police, Hoshiarpur to consider the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take necessary action thereon qua threat perception.

3. Notice of motion.

4. Mr. Ravinder Singh, DAG Punjab, who is present in Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course.

5. In view of the above, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.3-The Senior Superintendent of Police, Hoshiarpur to consider and decide the aforesaid representation dated 01.03.2026 (Annexure P-13) of the petitioner qua threat perception only within a period of 30 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law.

17.03.2026 (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL )

mamta JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.121 CRWP-2980-2026 Decided on : 17.03.2026 Amarjit Singh ...... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL ***

Present : Mr. Rajeev K.Kapila, Advocate for the petitioner.

***

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL , J (ORAL)

1. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner from respondents No.6. It is stated in the petition that the petitioner has already made representation dated 01.03.2026 (Annexure P-13) before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Hoshiarpur raising the said grievances, but no action has been taken so far.

2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.3-The Senior Superintendent of Police, Hoshiarpur to consider the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take necessary action thereon qua threat perception.

3. Notice of motion.

4. Mr. Ravinder Singh, DAG Punjab, who is present in Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course.

5. In view of the above, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.3-The Senior Superintendent of Police, Hoshiarpur to consider and decide the aforesaid representation dated 01.03.2026 (Annexure P-13) of the petitioner qua threat perception only within a period of 30 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law.

17.03.2026 (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL )

mamta JUDGE