SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 5328

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SMT KAMLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 16.03.2026 Smt. Kamla ….Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Sanchit Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Akshit Pathania, AAG, Haryana Mr. Aakash Singla, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 4 ***

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 04.02.2025 and 27.06.2025 whereby respondents have rejected her claim for compensation/financial assistance under Mukhya Mantri Kishan Evam Khetihar Mazdoor Jiwan Suraksha Yojna, 2013 (for short ‘2013 Yojna’).

2. The petitioner’s husband namely Sh. Ram Kumar on 30.07.2024 attempted to close hole of the canal (mogha) at around 10:00 PM. Due to heavy water flow, he fell in the canal and drowned. The petitioner under 2013 Yojna applied for compensation. As per said Yojna, in case of death, dependents are entitled to financial assistance of Rs.5,00,000/-. The Secretary, Market Committee, Siwani vide order dated 04.02.2025 dismissed her claim. She preferred an appeal before Secretary, Har

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top