SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 5333

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BALRAJ SINGH – Appellant
Versus
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT AND ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH BALRAJ SINGH ...PETITIONER VERSUS PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT AND ORS.

....RESPONDENTS

1. The date when the judgment is reserved 28.01.2026 2. The date when the judgment is pronounced 16.03.2026 3. The date when the judgment is uploaded 16.03.2026

4. Whether only operative part of the judgment is Full pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced

5. The delay, if any of the pronouncement of full Not applicable judgment and reason thereof.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL.

Present: Mr. R.K. Malik, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yashdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Raman Mahajan, Advocate for respondents no. 1 and 2.

Mr. R.D. Sharma, DAG, Haryana ****

SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J Prayer

1. The jurisdiction of this court has been invoked under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for quashing of order dated 18.12.2007 (Annexure P-6) whereby representation of the petitioner has been rejected with a further direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner for promotion as assistant from the date juniors to the petitioner have been promoted with grant of all consequential benefits.

Brief Facts

2. The petitione

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top