IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Gurnam Singh(since deceased) through LRs and another ...Appellants Versus Bal Kaur (since deceased) through LRs and another ...Respondents Reserved on 12.03.2026 Pronounced on: 16.03.2026 Pronounced fully/operative part: Fully CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Argued by: Mr. D.P.S. Bajwa, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Vicky Sharma, Advocate and Mr. K.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for the respondents.

DEEPAK GUPTA, J.

The present Regular Second Appeal has been filed by defendants No.1 and 2, who were the vendees in the transaction in question, challenging the concurrent findings recorded by the Courts below. The suit for possession by way of pre-emption filed by the plaintiff Bal Kaur (now represented through her legal representatives – respondent No.1 herein) was decreed by the learned trial Court vide judgment & decree dated 29.05.1992. The appeal preferred by the defendants–vendees (appellants herein through their respective LRs) was dismissed by the learned First Appellate Court on 02.03.1995, thereby affirming the findings recorded by the trial Court.

2. For the sake of convenience and to avoid confusion, the parties shall her