SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 5441

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ASHOK SAHNI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Ashok Sahni ....Petitioner V/s State of Punjab ....Respondent Date of decision: 18.03.2026 Date of Uploading : 18.03.2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Harsh Vasu Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Hemant Aggarwal, DAG Punjab.

Mr. Ranjodh Singh Jodha, Advocate for the complainant *****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)

1. Present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking grant of anticipatory/pre-arrest bail under Sections 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘BNSS’) in FIR No.237 dated 10.12.2025 registered for offences punishable under Section 108 of the BNS, 2023 at Police Station Macchiwara, Khanna.

2. The FIR in the present case has been lodged on the statement of the complainant Kavita Devi, wife of the deceased Rajesh Kumar, who alleged that the deceased was engaged in labour contracting work and had developed a habit of gambling, owing to which he had incurred substantial debts. It has been further alleged that the petitioner, along with co-accused, had been advancing money to the deceased on commission for gambling purposes and thereafter demanding r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top