SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 5457

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJNI JAIN AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
PRITAM CHAUHAN AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 03.02.2026 Pronounced on: 18.03.2026 Rajni Jain and others … Petitioners Versus Pritam Chauhan and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Sapan Dhir, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Pooja Sareen, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

***

VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J.

The instant revision petition, preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assails the order dated 18.05.2024, passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Gurugram, vide which the application filed by the petitioners/defendants No.1 to 8 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the petitioners’) under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint was dismissed.

2. The respondent No.1/plaintiff-Pritam Chauhan (hereinafter referred to as ‘the respondent’) instituted a suit (Annexure P-4) for declaration of the registered sale deeds dated 17.05.2013 (two sale deeds), 29.05.2013, 06.09.2013 and 13.01.2014, executed by the respondent in favour of the petitioners, as null and void, for, the sale consideration referred to in the said sale deeds had not been paid. Consequential relief of pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top