IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

..Appellants Versus PARKASH CHAND ..Respondent Reserved on: 11.02.2026 Pronounced on : 18.03.2026 Uploaded on : 18.03.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Hitesh Verma, Advocate for respondent.

SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J.

1. The present regular second appeal is preferred by the appellants-State of Haryana against judgment and decree dated 30.04.2005, passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gurgaon and judgment and decree dated 27.09.2005 passed by learned District Judge, Gurgaon, whereby, the civil suit filed by the respondent was decreed in his favour and appeal filed by the appellants-State was dismissed, respectively.

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

2. Brief facts of the case as per the pleadings in the civil suit are that respondent was appointed on 10.07.1975 as Conductor. His services were terminated with effect from 10.11.1983. The termination order was set aside by Labour Court vide order dated 23.01.1998 and respondent was held entitled to reinstat