SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 5462

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
TARSEM SINGH AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
SOHAN SINGH ORS. – Respondent


AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on :-24.02.2026 Date of Pronouncement:-18.03.2026 Uploaded on:-18.03.2026 Tarsem Singh and Others … Appellants Versus Sohan Singh (Deceased) through His LRs and Others ... Respondents ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Argued by :-

Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Saachi Mahajan, Advocate, Mr. Shiv Charanjit, Advocate, Mr. Samridham Goyal, Advocate and Ms. Amrit Kaur, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Anhad Batta, Advocate for the respondents.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J .

1. The present Regular Second Appeal (hereinafter referred to as “RSA”) has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 20.07.2004 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Gurdaspur, whereby the appeal was allowed and the judgment and decree dated 29.03.2003 rendered by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gurdaspur was set aside.

2. In a concise narration of facts, the respondents–plaintiffs instituted a suit for possession of the suit land measuring 23 kanals 03 marlas, fully detailed and described in the head-note of the plaint. It was pleaded that although the Jamabandi entries depicted the appellants–

defendants to be in possession as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top