IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (124 Date of Decision:16.03.2026 SATISH KUMAR … Petitioner Versus RANI DEVI AND OTHERS ... Respondents ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. The petitioner has instituted the present Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court for setting aside the impugned order dated 18.02.2026 (Annexure P-9) passed by the learned District Judge, Panchkula, whereby the application filed by the petitioner seeking transfer of the rent appeals titled as Satish Vs. Jatinder (RA/22/2019) (Annexure P- 1); Satish Kumar Vs. Harish Kumar (RA/13/2024) (Annexure P-2); Kuldeep Vs. Amrit Khanna & Others (RA/2/2025) (Annexure P-3); Gagan Vs. Nirmala (RA/11/2020) (Annexure P-4); Rani Vs. Kajal (RA/18/2019) (Annexure P-5); Prem Chand through LRs. Vs. Nirmala (CA/10/2025) (Annexure P-6); and Sonu Vs. Kuldeep (CA/11/2025) (Annexure P-7) to a single Court for consolidated adjudication, so as to obviate the possibility of conflicting orders or judgments, as the application for the sa