IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Decided on : 16.03.2026 GAJE SINGH . .Applicant Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Khandelwal, Advocate for Mr. Ankur Sidhar, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Paul S. Saini, Senior Standing Counsel for the Union of India.

****

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral)

1. In the present review application, the prayer of the review applicant is for reviewing the order dated 05.02.2026 in CWP-32850-2018 passed by this Court on the ground that, in the order dated 05.02.2026, inadvertently, it has been mentioned that the petitioner has already retired from service whereas, as per official record, the petitioner retired from service on 02.07.2016. The said fact could not brought to the knowledge of this Court and therefore, keeping in view the said fact the impugned judgment dated 05.02.2026 is liable to be reviewed.

2. We have heard learned counsel for the review applicant and have gone through the case file with his able assistance.

3. The argument being raised by the learned counsel for the review applicants is that the interpretat