SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 5569

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PUNEET KAUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS – Respondent


127.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 13.03.2026 Puneet Kaur .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Ms. Alka Chatrath, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Surya Kumar, AAG, Punjab.

-----

NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL)

1 . The instant petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking quashing of order dated 10.09.2025 (Annexure P-13), passed by the Director, Education Recruitment Directorate, Department of School Education, Punjab (respondent No.3), whereby the claim of the petitioner for non-inclusion of her name in the select list (Annexures P-8 and P-9) for the post of ETT Teacher against advertisement No.3/2022, dated 12.10.2022 (Annexure P-3), has been rejected.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide advertisement No.3/2022, dated 12.10.2022 (Annexure P-3), 419 posts under Sportsman Category (General) were advertised, which included 359 backlog posts of Sportsman Category (General), and only 45 have been filled and the claim of the petitioner ought to have been considered against the remaining vacant posts. She further submits that th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top