109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2341-2026 Date of Decision: 13.03.2026 PRATEEK RATHEE @ PRATEEK RATHI ...Petitioner Vs.

NITIN BHARDWAJ (SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LR'S) AND ANOTHER ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

2. CR-2364-2026 PRATEEK RATHEE @ PRATEEK RATHI ...Petitioner Vs.

ROMESH CHANDER SHARMA ...Respondent Present: Mr. Gurdeep Singh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner.

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J. (Oral)

1. The present revision petitions have been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking to set aside the order dated 24.02.2026 (Annexure P-1) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gurugram, whereby the evidence of the petitioner/defendant was directed to be closed. The petitioner challenges the said order on the grounds that the same has been passed prematurely and without affording a fair opportunity to adduce the remaining evidence.

2. A perusal of the impugned order reveals that the respondent/plaintiff filed the present civil suit against the revisionist/defendant, pending before the learned Trial Court. After the plaintiff concluded evidence, the matter was fixed for the revisionists’

evidence.