SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 5580

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KAMAL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 13.03.2026 Date of uploading: 13.03.2026 Kamal Kumar ….Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ….Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present:- Mr. Keshav Pratap Singh & Mr. Abhishek Kharb, Advocates for the petitioner.

Ms. Priyanka Sadar, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)

1. The substantive prayer made in the instant petition reads thus:

“It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the record of the case be perused after and perusal of the same impugned order dated 9.1.2023 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehabad may kindly be set aside/quashed. Revision petition be allowed and the application under section 167 (2) of Cr.P.C. for grant of default bail may kindly be allowed, in the interest of justice.”

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has urged that the petitioner ought to have been extended the concession of default bail as the Chemical Examiner Report was not filed alongwith the challan. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner was arrested on 15.10.2022, whereinafter he was extended the concession of interim regular ba

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top