103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

CM-2285-CWP-2026;

RA-CW-79-2026 in/and CWP-6730-2025 Date of Decision:13.03.2026 UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ....PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS EX RECT HARJINDER SINGH AND ORS ….RESPONDENT(S)

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY Present: Ms. Saigeeta Srivastava, Advocate for the review applicants-petitioners.

Mr. Rajesh Sehgal, Advocate for the respondents.

****

ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (Oral)

CM-2285-CWP-2026 (delay)

1. This application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed on behalf of the review applicants-petitioners seeking condonation of delay of 159 days in filing the review application.

2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 159 days in filing the review application stands condoned.

Main Case (O&M)

3. The application for review is filed on behalf of the respondents(s)-Union of India stating that the claim of respondents was with regard to ‘invalid pension’ but it has been decided treating it to be a case of ‘disability pension’. It is therefore submitted that reliance could not have been placed upon the judgment of Sukhvinder Sing