IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-6282-2025 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 12.03.2026 Hari Om @ Hari Om Sharma ......Petitioner Vs.

Mukesh Kumar and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashish Yadav, Advocate, for the respondents.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL)

1. The present petition has been filed for setting aside order dated 29.05.2025 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rewari, whereby the application filed by the petitioner for recalling of restoration order dated 06.02.2025 was dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that application filed by the petitioner was wrongly dismissed ignoring the mandatory provision of Order IX Rule 9(2) CPC, whereby notice is required to be given to the respondents in case the suit which was dismissed in default is to be restored.

3. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents contends that learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rewari, has rightly allowed the application filed by the respondents for restoration of the suit, which was dismissed in default.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and