SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 5646

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
INDERBIR SINGH AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

226 CR-8121-2017(O&M)

Date of decision: 12.03.2026 Inderbir Singh & Others ...Petitioner(s)

Vs.

Union of India & Another ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Aseem Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.1.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Present Revision Petition has been filed by the landowners/decree holders seeking setting aside of the order dated 20.05.2017 (Annexure P1) passed by the learned Executing Court whereby it has been held that the petitioners are not entitled to enhanced compensation as they have not availed of the remedy of filing appeal.

2. It is inter alia submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the land of the petitioners and other similarly situated landowners had been acquired under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 (hereinafter called “the Act”). It is submitted that land of five villages namely Dholewal, Daba, Gill No.2, Sherpur Kalan and Sherpur Khurd were acquired. Village of the petitioners is village Daba. It is submitted that at that time, compensation was made to the landowners by getting Form K s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top