IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : March 11, 2026 Randeep Singh Guleria .. Petitioner Versus Union of India and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Navdeep Singh, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Advocate and Ms. Arshita Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Anil Chawla, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondents-UOI.

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL)

1. In the present writ petition, the challenge is to the order dated 05.08.2014 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Tribunal by which, the adverse remarks recorded in the Annual Confidential Report (Annexure A-8) for the period starting from 29.03.2006 to 30.08.2006, has been upheld by the Tribunal to be correct in the facts and circumstances of the present case.

2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner argues that not only the Army Authorities but also the Tribunal has ignored the relevant facts which would go to show that not only the incident which took place on 22.02.2006 could not have been taken into account to record the adverse report against the petitioner in the ACR but, even incident dated 12