SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 5750

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIPIN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
MUKESH MEHNDIRATTA AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (127) CR No. 2310 of 2026 (O&M)

Date of Decision : 11.03.2026 Vipin Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Mukesh Mehndiratta and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. D.S. Matya, Advocate for the petitioner.

***

Amarinder Singh Grewal, J. (Oral)

CM-5115-CII-2026 Application is allowed, as prayed for.

CR-2310-2026 (O&M)

1. The present civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 for setting-aside the impugned order dated 11.11.2025 (Annexure P-14) passed by learned Rent Controller, Ambala, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order XI Rule

14 CPC for production of documents was dismissed.

2. Record would reveal that respondent-petitioners Mukesh Mehndiratta and another had filed a petition under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act No. 11 of 1973 for ejectment of the petitioner-respondent from Shop No. 7568/4, Bans Bazar, Ambala City on the ground of arrears of rent and personal necessity etc. Upon notice of the petition, the present petitioner appeared and filed the written statement.

3. During the pendency of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top