SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 5755

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAKESH PAL KAUSHIK AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
BRIJBHUSHAN AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

125-1 Reserved on : 15.01.2026 Pronounced on : 11.03.2026 Uploaded on : 11.03.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced? No Whether full judgment is pronounced? Yes Rakesh Pal Kaushik and others ...... Petitioners versus Brij Bhushan and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. D.P. Kaushik, petitioner No.2 in person (V.C.).

****

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral)

1. Petitioner No.2, who appeared in person on 15.01.2026 through V.C. sought time to submit written arguments. He was granted time. He, however, has failed to submit any written arguments till date.

2. The present petition is directed against order dated 19.12.2017 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division) SAS Nagar (Mohali) whereby application filed by the petitioner under Section 144 CPC has been dismissed.

3. Petitioner is a plaintiff in a suit for separate possession by way of partition. Application was filed under Section 144 CPC wherein the plaintiff prayed as under:-

“In view of the above facts and circumstances this hon'ble Court may in restitution and variation of the decree appearing at Pages 103-105 of Replication of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top