IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAKESH PAL KAUSHIK AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
BRIJBHUSHAN AND OTHERS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
125-1 Reserved on : 15.01.2026 Pronounced on : 11.03.2026 Uploaded on : 11.03.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced? No Whether full judgment is pronounced? Yes Rakesh Pal Kaushik and others ...... Petitioners versus Brij Bhushan and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. D.P. Kaushik, petitioner No.2 in person (V.C.).
****
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral)
1. Petitioner No.2, who appeared in person on 15.01.2026 through V.C. sought time to submit written arguments. He was granted time. He, however, has failed to submit any written arguments till date.
2. The present petition is directed against order dated 19.12.2017 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division) SAS Nagar (Mohali) whereby application filed by the petitioner under Section 144 CPC has been dismissed.
3. Petitioner is a plaintiff in a suit for separate possession by way of partition. Application was filed under Section 144 CPC wherein the plaintiff prayed as under:-
“In view of the above facts and circumstances this hon'ble Court may in restitution and variation of the decree appearing at Pages 103-105 of Replication of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.