IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 11.03.2026 Sher Singh ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Isham Singh and others ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Navmohit Singh, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Sanjay Verma, Ms. Neha and Ms. Yogita Soni, Advocates for the respondents.

******

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Present Second Appeal has been filed by defendant No.1 against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned District Courts; whereby suit filed by the plaintiff/respondent no.1 herein, for mandatory injunction and permanent injunction, has been decreed by both the District Courts.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff had filed a civil suit seeking mandatory injunction directing the defendants to remove illegal construction from the portion of the street; and further a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendant no.1 from raising any type of construction over the suit land as mentioned in para 1 of the plaint forcibly and illegally in any manner, now or in future.

3. It was the pleaded case of the plaintiff in the plaint that inhabitants of the village including the plaintiff are facing inconvenience in ingress a