SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 5773

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-653-2026 (O&M)

Date of decision: 11.03.2026 RAJ KUMAR AND ORS. ….Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. Aman Pal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Neha Rani, Advocate Mr. Rajender Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG Haryana.

..…

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The instant revision petition has been filed challenging the judgment dated 23.02.2026, passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra (hereinafter referred to as 'learned trial Court') in Sessions case CRA No.132 of 2018, titled as ‘Raj Kumar & Ors. vs. State of Haryana, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioners was dismissed and the judgment of conviction dated 16.03.2018 and the order of sentence dated 17.03.2018 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Kurukshetra was upheld in case arising out of FIR No. 739 dated 15.11.2012, registered under Sections 323, 341, 506, 34 IPC at Police Station City Thanesar, District Kurukshetra.

2. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he is not challenging the sentence and confines

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top