IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (cid:15)(cid:2)(cid:16)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:21)(cid:16)(cid:10)(cid:22)(cid:18)(cid:19)(cid:23)(cid:15)

......Appellant Vs.

RAMESH KUMAR AND ORS ......Respondents Reserved on: 12.02.2026 Pronounced on: 11.03.2026 Uploaded on: 12.03.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Ms. Lipika, Advocate for appellant.

Mr. Saurabh Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vaneet K. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2.

Mr. Satpal Dhamija, Advocate for respondent No.3-Insurance Company.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL)

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 27.02.2010 passed in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short ‘1988 Act’), by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Yamunanagar at Jagadhri (in short ‘the Tribunal’) for enhancement of compensation, granted to the appellant/claimant to the tune of Rs.45,800/- along with interest @ 7.5 % per annum on account of injuries sustained by the appellant/claimant – Harjinder Singh, occurred on 14.05.2007.

2. As sol