(cid:16)(cid:17)(cid:9)(cid:18)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:9)(cid:19)(cid:16)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:9)(cid:1)(cid:11)(cid:22)(cid:2)(cid:18)(cid:9)(cid:11)(cid:23)(cid:9)(cid:24)(cid:22)(cid:17)ti(cid:26)(cid:27)(cid:9)(cid:26)(cid:17)(cid:28)(cid:9)(cid:19)(cid:26)(cid:2)(cid:29)(cid:26)(cid:17)(cid:26)(cid:9)(cid:26)(cid:18)(cid:9)(cid:1)(cid:19)(cid:26)(cid:17)(cid:28)(cid:16)(cid:21)(cid:26)(cid:2)(cid:19)

(cid:9) (cid:28)(cid:31) !(cid:9)"#(cid:9)$!%&’&"((cid:15)(cid:9)(cid:6)(cid:7))(cid:7)*)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:4)(cid:5)

(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:4)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:12)

Ram Kumar and ors. …... Petitioner(s)

V/s State of Haryana andd anr. ...Respondent(s)

(cid:1)(cid:11)(cid:2)(cid:26)(cid:13)(cid:15) (cid:19)(cid:11)(cid:17)+(cid:27),(cid:20)(cid:9)(cid:13)(cid:2))(cid:9)ti(cid:22)-(cid:18)(cid:16)(cid:1)(cid:20)(cid:9)ti(cid:26)-ti(cid:16)(cid:18)(cid:9)-(cid:16)(cid:17)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:9)(cid:27)(cid:20)(cid:28)(cid:16)

Present: Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Viney Phogat, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Lalit Narang, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)

(cid:9)ti(cid:26)-ti(cid:16)(cid:18)(cid:9)-(cid:16)(cid:17)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:9)(cid:27)(cid:20)(cid:28)(cid:16).(cid:9)(cid:9)ti)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:11)/(cid:31)0(cid:14)(cid:9)

The prayer in the instant revision petition is for setting aside of the order dated 16.09.2025 passed by the Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Sirsa vide which the petitioners alongwith certain co5accused have been ordered to be summoned to face Trial under Section 358 BNSS (Section 319 Cr.P.C.) for the offences under Sections 103(2), 190 and 191(3) BNS, 2023.

2. The brief facts of the case are that an FIR No. 0361 dated 18.07.2024 under Sections 191(3), 190 and 103 (2) BNS, 2023, Police Station Dabwali Sadar (Annexure P51) came to be registered against Ram Kumar son of Banwari Lal, Hetram son of Banwari Lal, Rajesh son of Ram Kumar, Mukesh son of Hetram, Pawan son of Hetram, Vikram son of Ram Kumar, Dara Singh son of Bahadur Singh and Om Prakash son of Ramlal.

The relevant extract of the FIR (Annexure P51) is as under:5 To, The Hon'ble Station House Officer, Police Station Sadar Dabwali. Sir, It is most respectfully submitted that I, Sukhdev, son of Rai Sahab, resident of village Jandwala Bishnoiyan, am a resident of the said village. We are two brothers Mukesh Kumar, my elder brother, and I, Sukhdev, the younger. 1, Sukhdev Singh, was sleeping inside the house, while my brother Mukesh was sleeping in the plot situated in front of the house. Near him, Kirtan son of Rajendra and Sunil son of Bhagirath were also sleeping. At about 01:30 A.M., I suddenly heard the screams of my brother. On hearing my brother's screams, I ran towards the plot. When I reached there, I saw the following persons running away from the direction of our plot: Ramkumar son of Banwari Lal, Hetram son of Banwari Lal, Rajesh son of Ramkumar Mukesh son of Hetram, Pawan son of Hetram, Vikram son of Ramkumar, Dara Singh son of Bahadur Singh, all residents of village Jandwala Bishnoiyan and Om Prakash son of Ramlal, resident of village Jandwala Bishnoiyan. When I went inside the plot, I saw that my brother Mukesh had multiple injuries on his mouth and neck caused by a kassi (sharp2edged hoe). When I held my brother, I found that he had already died. Thereafter, I informed the police. Ramkumar, Hetram, Rajesh, Mukesh, Pawan, Vikram, Dara Singh and Om Prakash jointly murdered my brother Mukesh with the said kassi, which is lying at the spot. Strictest legal action be taken against them.

Sd/2 Sukhdev complainant

3. During the course of the investigation, Mukesh Kumar son of Hetram was joined in investigation and got recovered his blood5stained clothes. On conclusion of the investigation, while he was challaned, the seven remaining accused were exonerated.

4. After framing of charges, the statement of the complainant5 Sukhdev was recorded as PW52. Based on the said statement