SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 5900

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NIRMAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MUNISH GROVER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.4200 of 2013 (O&M)

NIRMAL SINGH …Appellant Vs MUNISH GROVER …Respondent

1 The date when the judgment was reserved 12.02.2026 2 The date when the judgment is pronounced 10.03.2026 3 The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website 10.03.2026

4 Whether only operative part of the judgment is Full pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced

5 The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full Not applicable judgment, and reasons thereof.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Sahil Soi, Advocate for the appellant.

Respondent ex-parte.

****

HARKESH MANUJA, J.

[1]. The present appeal is preferred by the appellant-Nirmal Singh challenging the award dated 16.05.2013 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Moga, whereby compensation to the tune of Rs.1,33,000/- along with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization was granted in favour of respondent/claimant on account of injuries suffered by the respondent/claimant in the motor vehicular accident dated

19.06.2010.

FACTS [2]. The claimant/respondent, being injured filed a claim petition before the learned T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top